Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Chaos In California: Newsom Deals With Minimum Wage Law Fallout

This article was originally published at Publications approved for syndication have permission to republish this article, such as Microsoft News, Yahoo News, Newsbreak, UltimateNewswire and others. To learn more about syndication opportunities, visit About Us.
20 dollars per hour

California’s recent move to raise the minimum wage for fast-food workers to $20 per hour, up from the current $15.50, effective April 2024, has sparked significant discussions about its impact on the labor market, businesses, and the broader economy. The decision, which follows legislative efforts to bolster the wages of the state’s lowest-paid employees, has elicited diverse perspectives on its potential consequences and implications.

An exemption

The minimum wage law appears to contain an exemption that benefits Panera Bread franchise owner by Greg Flynn, a major campaign donor to Governor Newsom. However, Newsom denies that the company is exempt.

On-site bakeries

While the law aims to help low-wage fast food employees, it does not apply to restaurants with on-site bakeries selling bread. “This story is absurd,” Newsom spokesperson Alex Stack said.

Greg Flynn

Panera Bread franchise owner Greg Flynn has donated over $220,000 to Newsom. Newsom’s office denies Flynn received special treatment, arguing Panera mixes dough off-site, but they did not clarify the exemption last year when asked.

An investigation

Republicans are calling for an investigation into whether campaign contributions influenced the bill language. “Such a narrow exemption has very little practical value. As it applies to all of our peer restaurants in the fast casual segment, we will almost certainly have to offer market value wages in order to attract and retain employees,” Flynn stated.

Campaign contributions

“Put simply, campaign contributions should not buy carveouts in legislation,” state Senate leader Brian Jones said. “It’s unacceptable.”

No explanation

“This exemption, there is no explanation for it. Someone had to push for it,” Assemblymember James Gallagher said.

Wage inequalities

The wage hike, set to affect approximately 400,000 fast-food workers, represents a notable step in targeted efforts to address wage disparities within specific sectors. California’s initiative reflects a broader trend of industry-specific minimum wage measures, such as the recent legislation to boost wages for health care workers, signaling a nuanced approach to addressing wage inequalities across different professional domains.

Start parceling

“I’m not going to try to start parceling every individual group,” Assemblymember Chris Holden said. “The way that the bill moved forward, everyone who’s in is in.”

Hundreds of businesses

Supporters say it was a compromise involving hundreds of businesses. “Like all transformational initiatives, it addressed difficult questions around its scope, including what constitutes a fast-food restaurant as opposed to a bakery, for example, and it involved literally hundreds of businesses in discussions,” Service Employees International Union California executive director Tia Orr said. “But the big picture is clear: a half million fast food workers in our state now have the power to improve their workplaces.”

A small problem

“The last time the governor got in the middle of a restaurant-related controversy, his hesitation to address it turned a small problem into a much bigger one,” University of Southern California and the University of California professor Dan Schnur said.

Price hikes

The wage increase is expected to result in a 5% rise in the prices of fast-food items, according to economists. While critics have expressed concerns about potential price hikes and inflationary pressures, proponents of the wage hike emphasize potential benefits, including improved employee satisfaction, mental health, and overall well-being.



  1. Robert Ladd

    June 8, 2024 at 4:32 pm

    Maybe, in the future, it would be wise not to consult with the “economists” that suggested that the wage increase would result in a 5% rise in the prices of fast-food items. Obviously, these weren’t reasonable predictions, but were aimed at trying to convince the uniformed public that the increase was relatively harmless.
    If you would like to appear credible when quoting people that make these kind of predictions it would be best not to hide behind “according to economists” as the source, and reveal specifically who made these ridiculous claims.

    • William Reddy

      June 9, 2024 at 8:47 pm

      Republicans Receive Significant Money from Assault guns and they legally protect manufacturers and NRA and sellers which is so blatant is that the Republicans are classic hypocrites

      • Airpirate

        June 10, 2024 at 6:18 am

        That’s not a good comparison. And it misrepresents. NRA and gun manufacturers have been the target of gun control zealots for decades. Protections they get from Republicans are rooted in second amendment rights for average Americans and 5th and 14th amendment rights for manufacturers and NRA. These entities even enjoy 1st Amendment protections. Just a couple weeks ago, SCOTUS ruled the state of NY regulators violated the NRA’s 1st Amendment rights by urging banks and insurers to cut ties with the NRA in 2018. Kinda like current administration officials being outed for pressuring social media companies to censure conservative social media content. I don’t see hypocrisy at all.

  2. Claud Rorick

    June 21, 2024 at 7:49 pm

    My family always say that I am killing my time here at web, except I know I amgetting familiarity every day by reading thes fastidious posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like