Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Opinion

It’s Time For Donald Trump To Drop Out

via CNN

Hearings are beginning in Colorado and Minnesota on lawsuits that seek to prevent former President Donald Trump from running for the presidency again by using the “insurrection” clause of the 14th Amendment.

These lawsuits argue that Trump’s actions to overturn the 2020 election and the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol disqualify him from holding public office.

The rulings in these cases are expected to be appealed and could eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court, which has never ruled on this provision of the Constitution. (Trending: Joe Biden Historic Take Down of Guns)

“We’ve had hearings with presidential candidates debating their eligibility before — Barack Obama, Ted Cruz, John McCain,” said Derek T. Muller, a Notre Dame law professor.

“Those legal questions are very heavy ones,” Muller said.

“Four years after taking an oath to ‘preserve, protect and defend’ the Constitution as President of the United States … Trump tried to overthrow the results of the 2020 election, leading to a violent insurrection at the United States Capitol to stop the lawful transfer of power to his successor,” alleges the Colorado lawsuit, filed on behalf of Republican and unaffiliated voters by the liberal group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

“By instigating this unprecedented assault on the American constitutional order, Trump violated his oath and disqualified himself under the Fourteenth Amendment from holding public office, including the Office of the President.” (Trending: Donald Trump Is A ‘Cockroach’ That Just Won’t Go Away)

Legal experts consider these cases to be significant because they were filed by liberal groups with substantial legal resources and targeted states with a clear process for challenging candidates’ qualifications.

Trump’s lawyers argue that the clause does not apply to the presidency and that his actions were protected free speech.

The hearings may include testimony from witnesses of the January 6th attack, and the lawyers will delve into the history of the provision and its limited legal precedent.

“Trump’s comments did not come close to ‘incitement,’ let alone ‘engagement’ in an insurrection,” his attorneys wrote in a filing in the Colorado case.

You May Also Like

Opinion

The FBI has seized New York City Mayor Eric Adams’ electronic devices as part of an investigation into potential illegal donations from the Turkish...

Media

A professor at Cal State University known for her involvement in Black Lives Matter criticized the Kansas City Chiefs’ Super Bowl victory and Taylor...

Opinion

King Arthur Baking, a Vermont-based company, faced criticism for hosting a baking competition that excluded white contestants, aiming to support People of Color entrepreneurs....

Opinion

Donald Trump, a leading figure in Republican polls, incorrectly stated that a U.S. soldier had died, exaggerating the injuries from an attack in northern...

Entertainment

In California, a Foster’s Freeze location closed and laid off its workers due to a new $20 per hour minimum wage that took effect...

Politics

Former President Trump criticized President Biden’s handling of the Mexican border, calling it a “war zone” and accusing Mexico of not cooperating. Trump expressed...

Opinion

The Biden administration is seeking Mexico’s assistance in curbing the record flow of migrants crossing into the U.S., but Mexico has its own demands,...