Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Gallery

Putin’s Crusade Against NATO Delivered New Blow

This article was originally published at StateOfUnion.org. Publications approved for syndication have permission to republish this article, such as Microsoft News, Yahoo News, Newsbreak, UltimateNewswire and others. To learn more about syndication opportunities, visit About Us.
Vladimir Putin

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s efforts to counter NATO expansion faced a setback as Turkey cleared the path for Sweden to join the strategic alliance. The Turkish parliament approved Sweden’s NATO membership with a vote of 287 to 55, as reported by the Associated Press.

Opposed NATO enlargement

Four members abstained, and a significant number did not participate in the vote among the 600-member legislative body. Putin and his supporters have vehemently opposed NATO enlargement, claiming it endangers Russia and highlighting it as a motivating factor behind Putin’s decision to invade Ukraine almost two years ago.

Continues to expand

Despite the opposition from the Russian president, NATO continues to expand its borders and welcomed Finland into the alliance last year. However, Sweden’s membership is uncertain due to objections from Turkey and Hungary.

Alliance

If Sweden joins NATO, the alliance would have significant influence over the Baltic Sea, except for the Russian exclave Kaliningrad situated between Lithuania and Poland. Newsweek contacted Putin’s office for a response via email on Tuesday.

Downplaying

Dr. Erwan Lagadec, an associate research professor at George Washington University’s Institute for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies, informed Newsweek that Putin’s reaction to Finland’s entry, downplaying its significance as “not a big deal, “may be repeated if Sweden’s inclusion is confirmed.

Overstretched

“Finland’s accession on the face of it is such an obvious own-goal for the Kremlin,” Lagadec said. “Putin is also fully cognizant of the fact that there’s not much he can do in practice to retaliate, as his military is already overstretched in Ukraine.”

Upcoming elections

“The context of the upcoming elections in Russia makes it even more likely that Putin will dismiss the news, and let his ‘attack dogs’ do the dirty work of signaling to Russian nationalists that he’s on top of things,” he added.

Consequences

Furthermore, Lagadec added that “the consequences of Sweden joining NATO are in some ways even more dire for Russia” than Finland’s membership, since “the move would complete the transformation of the Baltic Sea into a “NATO lake.”

Putin ally

With Turkey’s decision on Tuesday, the only remaining NATO member to endorse Sweden’s accession is Hungary. Hungary, led by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, is frequently characterized as a Putin ally.

Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson

Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson expressed his joy over Turkey’s vote in a social media post on X, previously known as Twitter, stating that it marked a significant step for his country and “one step closer to becoming a full member of NATO.”

Developing relations

In the previous month, Putin emphasized that he was “interested in developing relations” with NATO members and had “no reason” and “no geopolitical interest” to “fight with” member states.

National ratification

“I also count on Hungary to complete its national ratification as soon as possible,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said in a statement. “Sweden has fulfilled its commitments. Sweden’s membership makes NATO stronger and all of us safer.” The timing of when the Hungarian parliament, currently on recess until mid-February, will address Sweden’s membership remains uncertain.

Ground combat

Initially, Turkish President Recep Erdoğan was against Sweden’s NATO membership bid but changed his stance after a July agreement was reached. Recently, Stockholm pledged to deploy “ground combat units” to NATO’s borders with Russia, as tensions in the region escalate.

Baltic nations

The Baltic nations, comprising Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, have unveiled a strategy to construct numerous bunkers along their borders as a precautionary measure against any potential threat posed by Russia and its partner, Belarus.

Rejected

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a U.S.-based think tank, rejected the comments made at that moment, contending that Putin’s argument lacked credibility because of “the threats he and Kremlin pundits have recently been making against NATO member states.”

Future escalations

According to a recent report by ISW, Putin’s recent statements regarding the Baltic countries were interpreted as “to set information conditions” for “future escalations” that could potentially undermine and eventually break apart NATO.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Trending