Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Mark Meadows Granted Immunity In Criminal Case Against Trump

This article was originally published at Publications approved for syndication have permission to republish this article, such as Microsoft News, Yahoo News, Newsbreak, UltimateNewswire and others. To learn more about syndication opportunities, visit About Us.

Mark Meadows has reportedly received protection from Special Counsel Jack Smith.

Mark Meadows

via 6abc Philadelphia

Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows reportedly received protection from Special Counsel Jack Smith in exchange for testifying against former President Donald Trump in the federal case regarding the 2020 election.

Trump repeatedly lied

via WCPO 9

Meadows allegedly informed investigators that Trump repeatedly lied about winning the election and that claims of widespread voter fraud were false. Meadows also revealed that Trump called Rep. Kevin McCarthy during the Capitol riot and said, “I guess these people are more upset than you are.”

Federal investigators

via CBS

“Obviously we didn’t win,” Meadows told federal investigators. Meadows talked to the special counsel’s team at least three times in the past year.

Not guilty

via WCPO 9

Trump pleaded not guilty to a four-count indictment from the Justice Department.

The election results

via C-SPAN

Meadows has not been charged by Smith but is facing charges in Georgia for allegedly attempting to change the election results.

A public servant

via CBS

Meadows is also being charged with asking a public servant to break their oath of office.

‘Unmistakable and threatening’

via Fox New

Trump has been accused of making threats against special counsel Jack Smith’s former staffer Mark Meadows. Smith’s team has since accused Trump of attempting to “send an unmistakable and threatening message to a foreseeable witness in this case.”

A report

via C-SPAN

The accusation came after Trump’s response to a report which revealed Meadows having been granted immunity in a case against the 45th president.

‘Weaklings and cowards’

Fox News

In a series of posts on Truth Social, Trump expressed skepticism about Meadows potentially testifying against him. While stating that he doesn’t believe Meadows would turn on him, Trump implied that individuals who cooperate are “weaklings and cowards,” suggesting that such actions are detrimental to the nation’s future.

‘Deranged Prosecutor’

via Fox News

“I don’t think Mark Meadows would lie about the Rigged and Stollen 2020 Presidential Election merely for getting IMMUNITY against Prosecution (PERSECUTION!) by Deranged Prosecutor, Jack Smith,” Trump had stated.

Going to jail


“BUT, when you really think about it, after being hounded like a dog for three years, told you’ll be going to jail for the rest of your life, your money and your family will be forever gone, and we’re not at all interested in exposing those that did the RIGGING,” Trump said.

A statue

via ABC

Trump continued, “If you say BAD THINGS about that terrible ‘MONSTER,’ DONALD J. TRUMP, we won’t put you in prison, you can keep your family and your wealth, and, perhaps, if you can make up some really horrible ‘STUFF’ a out him, we may very well erect a statue of you in the middle of our decaying and now very violent Capital, Washington, D.C.”

The future


“Some people would make that deal, but they are weaklings and cowards, and so bad for the future our Failing Nation. I don’t think that Mark Meadows is one of them, but who really knows? MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!” Trump concluded.

Strained relationship

via WCPO 9

Trump’s public statements targeting his ex-chief of staff, Mark Meadows, have shed light on a potentially strained relationship between the two figures.

The federal case

via C-SPAN

The exchange of remarks, sparked by reports of Meadows cooperating with Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office in relation to the federal case surrounding the 2020 election, has brought to the forefront a narrative of loyalty and legal entanglements within the political sphere.

The 2020 election

via CNN

Trump contested Meadows’ reported assertions to the grand jury, particularly regarding the 2020 election and voter fraud allegations, thus casting doubt on Meadows’ testimony.

Witness tampering

via WCPO 9

Trump’s statements have raised concerns about potential witness tampering or violating the partial gag order imposed by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, which prohibits attacks on witnesses, prosecutors, and court personnel.

Public statements

via C-SPAN

This development underscores the legal complexities surrounding public statements made by influential figures involved in ongoing legal proceedings.

Limited immunity

via Fox News

Reports indicated that Meadows answered some of the special counsel’s questions in exchange for limited immunity in the federal Jan. 6 case, prompting Trump to question the validity of Meadows’ cooperation.

The effort to create

via C-SPAN

The nature of Meadows’ involvement in pivotal events related to the 2020 election, including his role in the effort to create alleged bogus slates of pro-Trump electors, has contributed to heightened scrutiny and legal implications.

Legal cases

Fox News

The public exchange between Trump and Meadows highlights the intersection of political loyalty, legal entanglements, and the broader implications for ongoing legal cases.

Legal proceedings

via CNN

As the dynamics between the two figures continue to unfold amidst legal proceedings, the implications of their interactions and statements warrant close observation in the context of the federal case and its potential ramifications.

Public scrutiny

via CBS

The recent public statements by former President Donald Trump targeting Mark Meadows have illuminated a complex interplay of loyalty, legal considerations, and public scrutiny within the political landscape.

Evolving relationship

via CBS

Against the backdrop of ongoing legal proceedings, the evolving relationship between Trump and Meadows underscores the intersection of politics and legal entanglements, warranting careful consideration of their implications and future developments.

You May Also Like