Legal expert Phil Holloway
Fox News
Legal expert Phil Holloway provided analysis on the Trump cases, saying it is very unlikely they will reach trial before the 2022 election. Holloway drew from the Young Thug case, where jury selection alone took over a year due to complexity.
No way on God’s green earth
Fox News
“There’s no way on God’s green earth that’s going to happen!” Holloway said. He noted the Trump indictments make conclusory statements that should be decided by a judge or jury.
Appeals on issues
CBS
Holloway also pointed to the high probability of appeals on issues like disqualification and dismissal arguments.
Took them over a year
CBS
“It took them over a year just to pick a jury. So if we started picking a jury today in the Trump-Rico case with all the defendants that are remaining, there’s no way the trial would start for probably two years,” he said.
Fraudulent and fake
CBS
“She’s saying things in that indictment like she’s calling the electors fraudulent and fake, and basically that’s putting the cart before the horse because these are conclusory statements that really should be left for a judge or a jury to decide,” Holloway said. “The constitutional issues particularly should be appealed if the defense loses. Those should be appealed also pre-trial.”
Trump’s Georgia case
CBS
Separately, a judge granted a defendant in Trump’s Georgia case permission to appeal to the state appeals court on whether the district attorney overstepped her authority in bringing election-related racketeering charges without following typical procedures involving a grand jury.
Delay in the legal cases
The Young Turks
The delay in the legal cases against former President Donald Trump has emerged as a pivotal factor shaping the political and legal landscape, prompting profound implications for the upcoming 2024 election. The intricate web of legal proceedings, trial postponements, and strategic maneuvers has underscored the complex interplay of legal, political, and electoral considerations at the heart of Trump’s legal challenges.
Trial schedules
Forbes
The delay in setting trial schedules and the protracted legal proceedings have cast uncertainty over the timeline for the resolution of the criminal cases against Donald Trump. The absence of definitive trial start dates and the persistence of unresolved pre-trial motions have contributed to the prolonged nature of the legal process, underscoring the intricate legal maneuvers and the impact on the progression of the cases.
Trump’s legal strategy
ABC
Trump’s legal strategy has been characterized by efforts to delay the trials, strategically leveraging the legal calendar and procedural complexities to potentially extend the timeline of the cases. The pursuit of delayed trial dates aligns with a broader strategy to navigate the legal landscape in anticipation of the 2024 election, reflecting the multifaceted interplay of legal proceedings and electoral considerations.
2024 election
ABC
The delay in Trump’s legal cases has significant implications for the 2024 election, particularly as the trials may extend beyond Election Day. The potential for delayed trial outcomes and the specter of criminal convictions could shape public perceptions and influence voter sentiments, underscoring the enduring impact of the legal proceedings on the electoral landscape.
Electoral dynamics
ABC
Trump’s legal maneuvers to delay the trials are underpinned by strategic calculations that intersect with the electoral dynamics. The potential for delayed legal resolutions and the strategic implications for Trump’s political prospects underscore the complex interweaving of legal strategies and electoral imperatives within the broader context of the upcoming election.
Public discourse
ABC
The delay in Trump’s legal cases has fueled public discourse and reflections on the accountability of public figures, triggering broader discussions on the intersection of legal accountability, political influence, and public perception. The protracted legal proceedings have precipitated nuanced considerations of legal accountability and the implications for public trust and confidence.
Voter decisions
ABC
The delay in Trump’s legal cases has prompted inquiries into the confluence of electoral considerations and legal transparency, raising questions about the potential impact on voter decisions and the transparency of legal processes. The intersection of electoral dynamics and legal proceedings underscores the multifaceted dimensions shaping public discourse and societal reflections on the legal delay.
Pivotal focal point
Inside Edition
The delay in Donald Trump’s legal cases has engendered a complex tapestry of legal, political, and electoral considerations, underscoring the intricate interplay of legal maneuvers, electoral ramifications, and public discourse. As the trials navigate a landscape of strategic calculations and legal complexities, the enduring impact of the delay on the electoral landscape and public perceptions remains a pivotal focal point within the broader context of Trump’s legal challenges.
Prompted reflections
Inside Edition
The delay in Donald Trump’s legal cases has prompted reflections on the interplay of legal, political, and electoral considerations, highlighting the enduring impact of the delay on the electoral landscape and public discourse.
