This article was originally published at StateOfUnion.org. Publications approved for syndication have permission to republish this article, such as Microsoft News, Yahoo News, Newsbreak, UltimateNewswire and others. To learn more about syndication opportunities, visit About Us.
A medical journal has retracted three articles that formed the basis of a judge’s ruling to restrict access to the abortion pill mifepristone, citing fundamental problems with the study design, methodology, and conclusions.
The lead author of the articles dismissed the retractions as an attempt to discredit his research.
The judge’s reliance on these articles is seen as conservative propaganda, and concerns have been raised about using flawed studies to influence national healthcare policies.
Although the ruling has been put on hold, there are doubts about the current Supreme Court’s stance on the matter.
Most Popular:
Jury Delivers Verdict in Case of Anti-Trump Prosecutor
Biden Snaps On Live TV — His Most Alarming Flub Yet
