Dr. Anthony Fauci’s recent testimony revealed that the six-foot social distancing rule may not have been based on scientific data, but rather emerged without substantial evidence.
The rule seemingly originated from flawed research and unclear communications between health officials.
Despite early knowledge that COVID-19 posed minimal risk to most Americans, stringent containment measures were swiftly adopted.
Anthony Fauci Admits Six-Foot Social Distancing Was Based on Nothing: "It just sort of appeared… it had little scientific basis."
In 2020, Dr. Fauci said you are safe is you stay six feet apart and wear a mask. pic.twitter.com/jDaQiezSe4
— AnalyzingAmerica (@AnalyzAmerica) January 11, 2024
Lawmakers are now seeking answers about the decision-making process behind these guidelines and who was responsible for their implementation.
Anthony Fauci Admits Six-Foot Social Distancing Was Based on Nothing: "It just sort of appeared… it had little scientific basis."
In 2020, Dr. Fauci said you are safe is you stay six feet apart and wear a mask. pic.twitter.com/jDaQiezSe4
— AnalyzingAmerica (@AnalyzAmerica) January 11, 2024
Read Also:
Iconic Food Chain Closes Due To Crime In Blue State
Donald Trump Jr. Weighs In On VP Pick
