Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

US News

RNC’s Ronna McDaniel Accused Of ‘Potential Bribery, Potential Criminality’

via NBC News
This article was originally published at Publications approved for syndication have permission to republish this article, such as Microsoft News, Yahoo News, Newsbreak, UltimateNewswire and others. To learn more about syndication opportunities, visit About Us.

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson suggested that bribery charges against RNC chair Ronna McDaniel were possible in response to reports of a phone call between McDaniel and former President Trump attempting to influence state election officials.

Benson highlighted the coordinated effort to delay certification of the election results, creating doubt and confusion.

She also raised concerns about the reported offer of lawyers to election workers, suggesting potential bribery and criminality. (Trending: Joe Biden Emailed Hunter’s Business Associates 54 Times)

“It really underscores the vast conspiracy, for lack of a better word, that was at play. A coordinated effort in all the battleground states to delay certification creates enough confusion about the validity of the election results,” Benson said.

“Because if you have people block or refuse certify, that gives you another reason or him another reason to say, see, there’s something wrong, even though there is no evidence that there was anything wrong, and create this false sense of doubt that was all about leading to this false slate of electors being presented to Congress on January 6th.”

“Of course, we saw how that unfolded and the tragedy of that day.”

“Secretary Benson, the other part of the phone call, and we don’t have the audio yet, I assume at some point it’s going to come out, and we’ll all listen for ourselves. What do you make of what’s been reported, that the RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel suggested that lawyers would be provided to these election workers on this phone call? What does that add up to?” Jim Acosta pressed.

“Well, it certainly suggests an offer of something of value, sort of paying for attorneys in order to not fail to do your public duty, which in this case was very clear,” Benson said.

“These local officials had a public legal duty, a ministerial responsibility to certify the election. So offering something to someone of value for them to fail to do their legal duty under the law would suggest, you know, potential bribery, potential criminality.”

“Of course, it all depends on whether this recording is ultimately accessed by prosecutors, and whether it becomes part of the investigations that are already ongoing in criminal proceedings at the state and federal level.”

Most Popular:

Judge Announces Historic Ruling In Jeffrey Epstein Case

Assault Weapons Ban Set To Take Effect, Here’s What To Know

Prominent LGBTQ Activist Arrested Over Disturbing Charges

You May Also Like