The text discusses Scientific American’s approach to the concept of human sexuality and the response it received on social media.
It criticizes the magazine for presenting a convoluted and evasive answer to the question of how many sexes there are, attributing this to the influence of LGBT issues and transgenderism.
The article appears to avoid the topic of sex due to its complexity and ethical considerations, ultimately leading to the conclusion that the answer depends on various factors. (Trending: US Troops Deliver Devastating Blow to Biden)
The answer to the question of how many sexes exist differs depending on the context | Analysis https://t.co/W68vMnVOA0
— Scientific American (@sciam) October 24, 2023
It may have just been too toxic, “following concerns in the anthropological community that the panel conveyed antitransgender sentiment and decrepit ways of thinking about human variation.”
“We have no warrant to make authoritative declarations on this issue from a scientific standpoint that is uninformed by ethical, moral or social considerations,” wrote the Scientific American.
Adding, “We are in good company here because sex encompasses such a range of questions that we doubt any one medical, scientific or humanistic practitioner would be able to come up with a question that encompasses all of the ways in which humans are affected by sex, however it is construed.”
The answer to the question of how many sexes exist differs depending on the context | Analysis https://t.co/W68vMnVOA0
— Scientific American (@sciam) October 24, 2023
The magazine’s approach received ridicule and backlash on various platforms.
The answer to the question of how many sexes exist differs depending on the context | Analysis https://t.co/W68vMnVOA0
— Scientific American (@sciam) October 24, 2023
Most Popular:
Democrat Says The Unthinkable About Trump On Live TV
Dad Strips Down To Crop Top To Protest School Dress Code
Trump Gets Another Big Endorsement
